 |
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jonny Moderator

Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Posts: 568 Location: US 2177 Cash Points
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 Post subject: East African ban on plastics bags |
|
|
East African ban on plastics bags
Kenya and Uganda have banned the use of thin plastic bags in an effort to curb environmental damage.
Ugandan Finance Minister Ezra Suruma banned the importation and use of the thinnest bags and imposed a 120% tax on thicker ones in his new budget.
The Kenyan finance minister imposed similar restrictions in his budget, following Rwanda and Tanzania.
The BBC's Juliet Njeri in Nairobi says discarded plastic bags are often seen by the roadside in residential areas.
She also says that there is a problem with bags blocking drains in the city.
Tanzania set the pace for the East African Community in 2006, when Vice-President Ali Mohamed Shein announced a total ban on plastic bags and ordered a switch to recyclable materials or biodegradable alternatives.
"These measures are expected to encourage the industry players to devise environmentally friendlier and hopefully recyclable bags," Kenyan Finance Minister Amos Kimunya announced in the capital, Nairobi.
Immediate effect
The Ugandan minister said the ban was being introduced because of "serious environmental concerns and difficulties in the disposal of plastic bags and plastic containers."
The ban will take effect in Kenya at the stroke of midnight on Thursday 14 June.
In Uganda, Mr Suruma said the ban would come into effect on 1 July but gave traders until 30 September this year to sell off products already in stock.
Rwanda, which was admitted into the East African Community this year, banned the importation and use of plastics less than 100 microns thick in 2005.
-----------------------
BBC _________________ Opportunities are never lost, someone will take the ones you miss. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mariam Colonel


Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 349
930 Cash Points
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Finally!! Thank God!!! should have been done five or ten years ago!! better late than never, though.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ajmushi Captain


Joined: 12 Nov 2006 Posts: 55 Location: US 4 Cash Points
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Mariam I noticed you quickly embraced this changes and I suppose you got very good reasons for that.
I am aware of the environmental friendliness that these changes could bring but what I am not sure is the economical effect. What does this translate down to the pockets of the consumers?? Is the alternative going to be cost efficient as well or this is just another scam of making a few people rich by monopolizing the market? .
I have not paid much attention to this matter but from the brief reading some of the key points made were hardship of disposing current plastic bags, problem of clogging drains and cluttering up the cities. To me all these points seem to be non-relevant to the plastic density but rather something to do with people sanity for disposing the material. What has plastic density got to do with recycling??
I think emphasis should be been placed on promoting sanitation and recycling programs were the general concept of throwing bags on the streets will slowly transition to collecting them for recycling. Failure to do so will result the same effect of the above mentioned problems and could become a costlier alternative for the consumer.
How is it that the thin density bags are the mostly used in the first world countries and they recycle them just like other plastic material? I think it’s mostly to do with economical factors. _________________ AjM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mariam Colonel


Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 349
930 Cash Points
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
AjMushi,
Sorry I haven't been in Kforum for a while so I didn't realize you asked/said something. I am tempted to agree with your speculation that I have got very good reasons to embrace the changes. Please allow me to talk more as a citizen of the world rather than an African here. I believe in environmental sustainability and Plastic bags clog drains and cause flooding, they pollute rivers and streams, killing animals and destroy our plants - animals such as turtles, ingest plastic bags or are strangled by them, plus many others especially in marine environments where plastic bags resemble jellyfish and other food items. Over 100,000 birds, whales, seals and turtles worldwide are killed by plastic rubbish every year, I just can't remember the numbers but Africa I think leads the death toll and we need to act fast.
Plastic bags take years to photodegrade and have a very short life span. Most plastic bags are made up of non-degradable, non-renewable resources and most never biodgredes, which contribute to the desertification of land by stifling the soil and make it unfavourable for all plant growth as these plastics won't decompose. It is estimated that plastic bags have a life span of 50 to 100 years, that means the bags can clog the soil for up to a century, taking a severe toll on plant life, a single use plastic bags made of high density form remain in the environment for up to approx. 1,000 years, then add to this the growing suspicion that plastic use may lead to serious health problems since they are believed to be carcinogen. They're made from fossil fuels and although we will run out of oil eventually, but we'll always have our plastic garbage.
I understand your concern, but many countries and cities (including some in the USA) have already implemented very similar legislation to what African nations are doing now. I learnt a while back that in the US alone where you could think recycling is doing well, it is said only 1-2% of 100 billion bags used a year is being recycled!!! Now take a guess what will it take to recycle them and just to bring awareness in Africa!!!!
Believe it or not, the economic effects of using plastic bags are more dangerous than a brief and shallow explanations given on the article above. Plastics are used because they are easy and cheap to make and they can last a long time. Unfortunately these same useful qualities can make plastic a huge pollution problem. The cheapness means plastic gets discarded easily and its long life means it survives in the environment for long periods where it can do great harm. Because plastic does not decompose, and requires high energy ultra-violet light to break down, the amount of plastic waste in many oceans is steadily increasing. Plastic bags impose great danger to ecosystem which is a scourge that everyone in the society has a social responsibility to tackle.
Talking about economical factors; how about trying the old traditional reusable raffia bags? Perhaps the road to the future may also involve revisiting past customs when these baskets were the norm, not plastic bags. These are a great eco-friendly alternative to plastic shopping bags that threaten a healthy eco-system. Promoting sanitation and recycling programs are the great ways to control the problem, however, they are as costlier with stagering effects. The economical drawbacks you show concerns about and substitute solutions you emphasize on all take off the important issue which is CONSUMPTION, getting into the habit of bringing your own shopping bag can slash this problem across the board. Manufacturing plastic is known to be resource-intensive and yields various nasty emissions that contribute to global warming and degradation of water quality.
You also raised a question that "What has plastic density got to do with recycling?? " The plastic density is important, I will assume you didn't take Chemisty in Sec/High School. Density is a Scientific term for compactness, which is the amount of mass in a material compared to its volume. A large mass with a small volume means that the material is more compact or dense than a small mass with a large volume. Plastic bags are not created equal because they are meant for different purposes; some plastic bags are stronger than others, for example bags from clothing stores at the mall tend to be strong and thick, whereas those from local grocery store are flimsy and thin, and those wispy, clear bags from the dry cleaner.
There are many types of plastic bags, all designed for different purposes. Petroleum and natural gas are the primary sources of the key ingredients in plastic which is Polyethylene. It is being taught that, Plastic bags are made from one of three basic types: high-density polyethylene (HDPE) (grocery bags), low-density polyethylene (LDPE) (garment bags from the dry cleaner), or linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) (thick, glossy shopping bags); The major difference known between these three materials is the degree of branching of the polymer chain. HDPE and LLDPE are composed of linear, unbranched chains, while LDPE chains are branched. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tyk Lieutenant


Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 27
10 Cash Points
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 Post subject: Expect limited success |
|
|
| In Tanzania a similar ban was introduced last year. It was not a total ban rather an attempt to limit the use of the bags by taking off the market 'smaller' versions of the bag. The effect is like: you need to launch a research to even realize there has been any ban. The folks whose livelihood are intertwined in the trade/use of the bags simply devised a number of workarounds. The supposed alternative which is to use paper bags has it's own drawbacks, particularly on the environment. I guess more emphasis need to be put into changing shopping habits. Like convince people to use 'vikapu' time and again rather than a supposedly disposable plastic bag. A 'kikapu' could be made of plastic too, but then you can use the same again and again unlike a bag. Not many years back nobody knew about plastic bags but we did shop just fine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mariam Colonel


Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 349
930 Cash Points
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
exactly TYK, thank you!
I agree with you, this is the reason I also suggested going back and revisit past customs of carrying raffia/baskets/vikapu...they are attractive anyways:-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ajmushi Captain


Joined: 12 Nov 2006 Posts: 55 Location: US 4 Cash Points
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
Mariam thanks for the well researched detailed response. A point you might have missed on my question was actually based on the ban restriction from the first posting. I do understand plastic does not decompose and it’s even harder to get rid of the thicker polymers and the solution offered is not a balanced equation.
| Quote: |
| “Ugandan Finance Minister Ezra Suruma banned the importation and use of the thinnest bags and imposed a 120% tax on thicker ones in his new budget.” |
My argument to this ban is that at the end of the day these thicker plastic materials that are allowed at a higher taxation are even more hazardous to the environment and a hit the consumers pockets. If we are talking about protecting the environment lets talk on educating the consumers by enforcing programs that will lead to recycling versus trashing the streets and drains. Despite of our poor economy, I believe this culture can still be better implemented on different levels starting from introducing environment awareness in schools to enforcing recycling programs in municipal levels. Yes, it will not be a one day solution and it will take time to blend but I believe that will be the best cure for the environment protection. Remember back in the days of Marlboro bags….oh yes you should; those bags were so much reused due to their high density but one thing you should take a note is their disposal at the end of the day wasn’t/isn’t graceful.
I noticed Mariam and TYK heavily supporting the past customs of vikapu/raffia which is NOT a bad idea, however let us not close our eyes to the changing reality.
In this day and time so much has changed in our developing countries. We are catching up with the fast paced kinda life-style which forces us to adopt the western ways in so many ways and we have to face the reality. The issue here should be how to sustain these changes with minimal damage to the environment based on our economy. Going back to vikapu could be a solution to some but not for majority. Take into account the old good days of going to the market once a week coming back with “vikapu loads” are slowly transitioning to Supermarkets and small convenient stores to cope with the lifestyle changes. Due to these changes and the choice of convenience, consumers will still buy the heavily priced HIGH DENSITY plastic bags that they are forced to use as the only choice and poorly dispose them to cause even worse detrimental effects. Now Mariam according to your good research I believe this will fall under the approximate 1,000 years for the polymers to disintegrate….is this a safer choice?
***PRIORTIZE TO EDUCATE THE CONSUMER SOCIETY FIRST THEN OTHER CHANGES CAN BE IMPLEMENTED WITH MINIMAL DAMAGES** _________________ AjM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mariam Colonel


Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 349
930 Cash Points
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
AjMushi,
I can't answer for the UG minister but if I was one and had to pose tax at the higher bracket then most likely would be to discourage the consumption/import of such bags. It would be easier to ban the free bags which most of the time are the ones made up of non-recycled materials and are consumed at such a scary number while they don't end up collected as it may seem. Most thicker bags are made up of recycled materials, and also if you look, the thinner bags are used in larger quantities and since they are thin, one may sometimes need them doubled just for a couple or three items, while the thicker can put a lot more in it and also can be used numerous times. So I would say you tax the thicker in higher margins since it's the lesser evil. It's not that I advocate any type of plastic bags (high or low density). Also we have to remember ban on plastic bags and higher taxes are not only done in Africa.
Aso, I think I got your point on economic effect, what you missed is my intentions to show you that you may be saving consumer's pockets on plastic bags while forgetting drawbacks on other things, it's a vicious cycle here and you can't focus only on free plastic bags offered at the supermarket while prices go up for your seafood since the sea is polluted and can't give out enough or vegetables at the market because the land isn't favorable to grow plants or that your tourism sector is deteriorating because you don't get tourists for a mere reason that you don't have species/environment you used to have before to attract them, keep in mind an increased list of endangered animals and plants...in my opinion, you can't really talk about the economical benefits of using plastic/paper bags while both are detrimental to the environment, they use natural resources and are produced and consumed in large quantities which make it worse..... they cost us big time somewhere else as a result and cause more harm to the society.
The tradition vikapu are also in different sizes, so you don't have to carry the ones you would need to use for a month's long groceries only for one bottle of baby's formula! The government has the responsibility to watch for the welbeing of its people and environment... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonny Moderator

Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Posts: 568 Location: US 2177 Cash Points
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 Post subject: Niger Paves Over Its Garbage Problem With Plastic-Bag Bricks |
|
|
I don't think banning the use of plastic bags is the right answer especially since no equal/ similar alternative is available or being offered to those whose lives and businesses depend on them.
Maybe the right answer would be to find creative ways of disposing the plastic bags.
In the U.S they use variety of plastic bags and containers. Since there is no active ban in the US, I can only assume that they have creative ways of disposing the plastics.
Does anyone have any information on this?
Here is a creative solution that Niger applied back in 2005. Maybe this can be aplied for TZ and East Africa as a whole......
Niger Paves Over Its Garbage Problem With Plastic-Bag Bricks
Niamey, Niger (AFP) Nov 27, 2005
It's a familiar joke across Niger that the national bird of the northwest African desert state is a black plastic bag, winging its way from market stall to trash heap to flock to the bare-branched trees around the dusty capital.
In an effort to clean up its capital city and surrounding countryside for a hoped-for tourist boom, Niger is following the example set in Europe and around Africa by trying to curb the pollution caused by the ubiquitous single-use plastic bag.
Kenya and South Africa have made the thin and flimsy plastic bag illegal, while in Benin, plastic bags are recycled to make colourful bracelets or handbags.
But for the rest of the world, plastic bags are now consumed in staggering numbers and are responsible for massive disposal problems including unsightly litter and flooding.
Made of polyethylene, they are also hazardous to manufacture and take up to 1,000 years to decompose.
Rather than going to a ban or to bangles, Niger is turning its bags into filler for its perpetually crumbling roads.
In an experimental project financed by the European Union, bricks of the plastic sacks are being used to fill potholes around Niamey.
The government of Niger buys used plastic bags for 25 CFA francs, (about three cents) per kilo, then compresses them with a new ceramic mold technology and binds them into bricks.
"Weve found a system that works remarkably well," explained EU expert Paolo Gigli.
"The bags are melted and transformed into bricks with a cement mold, which saves time and money. The plastic bricks are then used to fill a pothole, and covered with earth or cement."
Gigli said the cost of the bricks is but a fraction of traditional road works, allowing the world's poorest country to do more to restore its haphazard road network.
An experimental batch was used to fill a pothole the size of a car in downtown Niamey in May. The covered area show no sign of erosion or weather damage, although the plastic bricks have not yet had to withstand extensive friction.
"We know this system is perfect for roads with little traffic, and we suspect it will hold up well to heavier trucks and buses," said Gigli. "Only time will tell."
To pave an entire kilometer of road will take roughly 40 tonnes of the molded bags and in just five months, more than 600 tonnes of bags have been collected.
"We can fit 45 plastic bricks in one square meter, costs are minimal, jobs are created and roads are improved," said Gigli.
But the bricks should not be seen as paving Niger's streets with gold, nor as a magic bullet for the plastic problem, he warned.
"Plastic bags are not about to disappear if they remain cheap to make, readily available to shoppers, and simple to toss out into the street," he said.
------------------- _________________ Opportunities are never lost, someone will take the ones you miss. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mariam Colonel


Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 349
930 Cash Points
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 Post subject: Re: Niger Paves Over Its Garbage Problem With Plastic-Bag Br |
|
|
I urge you guys to read this, not for the matter of arguing but to be more informed, I recognize it's long but worth reading...especially the last part about where the recycled trash goes!!!!
| Jonny wrote: |
I don't think banning the use of plastic bags is the right answer especially since no equal/ similar alternative is available or being offered to those whose lives and businesses depend on them.
|
once you start banning them people will look for alternatives...this is out of topic but I see a fair similarities to cigarettes; smoking cigarette was cool during our parents hey years and cig companies and businesses selling it amazingly profited, slowly smoking became a nasty behavior and a healthy concern, people voluntarily quit or never even start smoking, besides, most bars, restaurants, malls, etc are increasingly banning it, in some extent, in leau of banning it people started suing these companies, still consumed but in lesser quantities...Once it is strongly established that Plastic really is carcinogenic which means it causes cancer and linked to some deaths then people will start suing, at least in developed nations...Well, lLike how TYK said, we shopped just fine before their eve...
I came accross these funny but good responses:
" couple of basic rules of life: 1) ALL taxes are unfair, and B)ALL laws are full of "holes". You are correct to say public education and awareness are keys to the problem ... but the law doesn't hurt. Australia is banning incandescent light bulbs by 1012 ; they could educate 'til the kangaroos quit jumping, but banning 'em will make the transition much quicker.
Banning plastic bags along with incandescent light bulbs, and any car or light truck that gets less than 20 mpg, would be a good package for the whole US RIGHT NOW .... it'd save a lot of soldier's lives - AND improve the environment AS A SIDE NOTE"
...and I can personally relate to some points in this one:
"The conclusion is faulty. Why am I a "slob" who doesn't recycle these bags. Lessee:
1. The recycle center in my town doesn't take them. O.K. then what about ...
2. The grocery stores near me don't take them. Well how about ...
3. There is an open burn ban in my community. So I am left with ...
4. Reuse is an option that I use, but these bags are flimsey and when they rip and develop a hole, my only remaining option is .... The Trash!!
By the way, these bags are made from petroleum products. Give it about 20 years and they will be so expensive you won't be able to buy one. If we agree these bags have no positive purpose, other than simple convenience, and a significant public cost, then it is within the government realm to ban them".
PART I
| Jonny wrote: |
| In the U.S they use variety of plastic bags and containers. Since there is no active ban in the US, I can only assume that they have creative ways of disposing the plastics. Does anyone have any information on this? |
there is one US' City making efforts to ban ( yes it counts ) probably many more are on the way...
S.F. FIRST CITY TO BAN PLASTIC SHOPPING BAGS
Supermarkets and chain pharmacies will have to use recyclable or compostable sacks
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/03/28/MNGDROT5QN1.DTL
Paper or plastic? Not anymore in San Francisco.
The city's Board of Supervisors approved groundbreaking legislation Tuesday to outlaw plastic checkout bags at large supermarkets in about six months and large chain pharmacies in about a year.
The ordinance, sponsored by Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, is the first such law in any city in the United States and has been drawing global scrutiny this week.
"I am astounded and surprised by the worldwide attention," Mirkarimi said. "Hopefully, other cities and other states will follow suit."
Fifty years ago, plastic bags -- starting first with the sandwich bag -- were seen in the United States as a more sanitary and environmentally friendly alternative to the deforesting paper bag. Now an estimated 180 million plastic bags are distributed to shoppers each year in San Francisco. Made of filmy plastic, they are hard to recycle and easily blow into trees and waterways, where they are blamed for killing marine life. They also occupy much-needed landfill space.
Two years ago, San Francisco officials considered imposing a 17-cent tax on petroleum-based plastic bags before reaching a deal with the California Grocers Association. The agreement called for large supermarkets to reduce by 10 million the number of bags given to shoppers in 2006. The grocers association said it cut back by 7.6 million, but city officials called that figure unreliable and unverifiable because of poor data supplied by markets.
The dispute led to a renewed interest in outlawing the standard plastic bag, which Mirkarimi said Tuesday was a "relic of the past." Under the legislation, which passed 10-1 in the first of two votes, large markets and pharmacies will have the option of using compostable bags made of corn starch or bags made of recyclable paper. San Francisco will join a number of countries, such as Ireland, that already have outlawed plastic bags or have levied a tax on them. Final passage of the legislation is expected at the board's next scheduled meeting, and the mayor is expected to sign it.
The grocers association has warned that the new law will lead to higher prices for San Francisco shoppers.
"We're disappointed that the Board of Supervisors is going down this path," said Kristin Power, the association's vice president for government relations. "It will frustrate recycling efforts and will increase both consumer and retailer costs. There's also a real concern about the availability and quality of compostable bags."
Power said most of the group's members operating in San Francisco are likely to switch to paper bags "simply because of the affordability and availability issues."
Mirkarimi's legislation is one in a string of environmentally sensitive measures -- such as outlawing Styrofoam food containers and encouraging clean-fuel construction vehicles at city job sites -- adopted by the city in recent months.
"It's really exciting," Jared Blumenfeld, director of the city's Department of the Environment, said after the vote on Tuesday. "We're thrilled. It's been a long time in the making."
Blumenfeld said it takes 430,000 gallons of oil to manufacture 100 million bags. Compostable bags can be recycled in the city's green garbage bins and will make it more convenient for residents to recycle food scraps, he said.
Recycling of paper bags also is far more active today than it was when the plastic bag was first introduced to U.S. consumers.
The lone dissenting voice in the board chamber on Tuesday was Supervisor Ed Jew, who noted that 95,000 small businesses in San Francisco will continue to use plastic bags. Jew, who in his third month in office has taken to critiquing his colleagues for being too quick to burden residents and businesses with new mandates, complained that Mirkarimi's legislation has taken too much of the board's time.
"We need to move on to address the larger issues in San Francisco," Jew said shortly before he voted against the ordinance.
Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier, who introduced amendments this month that will subject pharmacy chains to the legislation, said many large businesses in San Francisco already participate in recycling programs.
"The target of this legislation is the bags themselves and improving the environment," she said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plastic bags by the numbers
180 million = Roughly the number of plastic shopping bags distributed in San Francisco each year.
2 to 3 cents = Amount each bag costs markets, compared with anywhere from 5 to 10 cents for a biodegradable bag.
4 trillion to 5 trillion = Number of nondegradable plastic bags used worldwide annually.
430,000 gallons = Amount of oil needed to produce 100 million nondegradable plastic bags.
Source: S.F. Department of the Environment; Worldwatch Institute
E-mail Charlie Goodyear at cgoodyear@sfchronicle.com.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/03/28/MNGDROT5QN1.DTL
PART II
| Jonny wrote: |
In the U.S they use variety of plastic bags and containers. Since there is no active ban in the US, I can only assume that they have creative ways of disposing the plastics.
Does anyone have any information on this? |
Where Do All Our "Recycled" Plastics Go?
http://www.things.org/~jym/greenpeace/where-recycled-plastics-go.html
Each week, residents of Seattle, Washington carefully sort their garbage for recycling. They put their plastic bottles, along with the paper, metal, and glass in special recycling containers provided by the city. Then trucks from Waste Management or Rabanco, two companies that operate curbside recycling programs, collect these materials and cart them off, supposedly to environmentally beneficial recycling facilities nearby.
From coast to coast scenes like this are now commonplace as Americans try to do their bit to save the environment. In recent years, the public has become increasingly aware that landfilling plastics and other nonbiodegradables preserves them forever, while burning them releases highly toxic chemicals. So now recycling is accepted as one's civic responsibility, on par with voting or safe driving.
Seattle leads the country in its recycling effort. But city officials say they have no idea where the recycled trash goes. In a recent interview, Ed Steyh who administers the city's recycling contracts said, "We don't have the resources to follow it. Right now, we pay the contractors to collect it and recycle it."
In a vast slum just outside Jakarta, for instance, women work in a crowded, unventilated room, separating the waste newspapers, pieces of clothing, metal scraps, poor quality and highly contaminated plastic from the reusable plastics. It's 90 degrees and too hot to wear protective smocks or gloves, not that they are available anyway. With their bare hands the Indonesian women wipe the sweat from their brows. The huge piles of plastic bags, liquid soap bottles, food wrappers, jugs, and disposable diapers have familiar logos Dow, DuPont, Monsanto, Solvay, Mobil.
A white powder blows out of some of these bags as women pull them from the pile. The Indonesian women can't read the English labels so they don't know that the powder is titanium dioxide, which causes respiratory damage. They do know, however, that when these Indonesian recycling companies began importing plastic waste from the U.S., workers developed breathing problems and skin rashes.
Once separated, the piles of discard are sent to a local dump. One Indonesian recycling company owner estimated that up to 40 per cent of the imported waste is landfilled. Workers shovel the "good" plastic into large grinding machines which turn out plastic pellets or flakes. The women next wash the surface residues and contaminants off these bits. The waste water is then poured onto the dirt floor or out the back door of the recycling plant.
The plastic pellets, sometimes mixed with new plastic or other additives, are melted and formed into long plastic cords. Once cooled, the cords are again chipped and sent to manufacturing plants in Asia to be made into shoe soles, containers, or toys.
During 1991, U.S. recycling companies sent over 35 million pounds of plastic waste to Indonesia. The majority of this went to two cities on the island of Java Jakarta and Surabaya. The U.S. exported over 200 million pounds of plastic waste last year to countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America, according to statistics compiled by Greenpeace from the records of a private company, the Port Import/Export Research Service. The list of recipients includes Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, Dominican Republic, Ghana, Ecuador, Guatemala, Guyana, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, Jamaica, S. Korea, Malaysia, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Taiwan, Tanzania, Thailand, and Trinidad & Tobago.
Hong Kong is the prime target: in 1991, over 75 million pounds of U.S. plastic waste went there and so far in 1992, it has received over half the total U.S. plastic waste exports. Recycling facilities in Hong Kong look much the same as those in Indonesia: the same plastic grinding, melting, and reshaping machines, the same strong noxious fumes. As in Indonesia, the untreated rinse water is discharged down drains or out the window. However, in realestate scare Hong Kong, the recycling shops are located on upper floors of densely packed, rundown industrial skyscrapers where they pose frightening fire hazards.
Increasingly, Hong Kong importers simply warehouses plastic waste destined for China where land and labor costs are much lower than in the mainland. In China, the process is the same, but the setting is different. In the Guangzhou countryside, rural workers sort the plastic waste inside a walledin courtyard just off a dirt road. There men load plastic scraps into huge cardboard boxes, while nearby children play and women hang laundry on a clothes line. Since there was an electricity blackout the day Greenpeace arrived, none of the machinery was in operation.
A massive pile of discards lay in the center of the courtyard. The facility manager explains that there is no central dump to dispose of this material, so it was scattered in random locations in the countryside.
Not infrequently, Asian importers find most of the plastic they receive is unusable trash. In August 1991, for instance, six containers of supposedly pure plastic waste from New York arrived in Shanghai. When the Chinese importers opened the containers, they discovered a grisly concoction of household garbage, blood transfusion bags, and other hospital waste. A Shanghai City Environmental Protection Bureau report concluded the shipment was 55 per cent unusable trash and warned, "In order to prevent pollution, you must immediately request a professional unit to thoroughly sterilize the waste plastic and household garbage."
Unlike China, Hong Kong and Indonesia, the Philippines has, on its books, a strict law banning waste imports. Despite this, U.S. industries and waste brokers succeeded in shipping over 15 million pounds of plastic waste there in 1991. As is the case in other poor countries, underfunded customs and environmental agencies were unable to intercept incoming waste shipments. And since the shipments are arranged covertly, the locations of the importing companies are unknown.
Recycling companies claim exports help divert waste from diminishing landfill capacity at home and provide needed jobs and materials abroad. "They have an urgent need to employ a lot of people, and it also helps them get more raw materials," wrote Earth Circle consultant Gretchen Brewer in the September 1991 issue of Plastics News.
At congressional hearings last fall, U.S. Chamber of Commerce official Harvey Alter reassured lawmakers that "there is no basis for accusations that the United States is 'dumping' hazardous (or other waste) on unsuspecting developing countries. Materials for recycling, virtually by definition, are sold to enterprises in countries with sophisticated manufacturing facilities." However, of the 15 Asian plastic recycling plants investigated by Greenpeace, such sophisticated equipment was nowhere to be seen.
In the U.S., waste is required to be tracked and monitored at all stages from production to transport to disposal. However, there is no such federal "cradle to grave" oversight for plastic waste exports abroad. In fact, since the government does not consider plastics to be hazardous waste, no records are kept on how much is shipped overseas and how much is disposed of or recycled in the U.S.
The Ontario Plastics Recycling in California sells all its plastic to China. But the company's chief executive Harrie Cohen told a Plastic News reporter, "I don't know exactly what they're doing with it." Similarly, Don Dentz, an official with Rabanco Company argues, "It is very difficult to follow this plastic all over Asia."
U.S. companies began shipping plastic waste overseas in the 1980s when they found themselves facing a serious crisis: the amount of plastic consumed in the U.S. was skyrocketing while its public image was plummeting. In 1989, U.S. corporations used over 12 billion pounds of plastic packaging designed to be thrown away as soon as the package was opened. In the 1990s, this figure is expected to double. But rather than reduce the plastic wrap, industry set out to repackage the public image of plastics with a $150 million p.r. campaign.
In a confidential December 22, 1989 letter, Society of the Plastics Industry President Larry Thomas warned plastic manufacturers, "The image of plastics among consumers is deteriorating at an alarmingly fast pace....Public opinion polls during the 80's show that an increasing percentage of the general public believes plastics are harmful to health and the environment. That percentage rose sharply from 56 percent in 1988 to 72 percent in 1989. At this point we will soon reach a point from which it will be impossible to recover our credibility."
During the 1980s, the plastics industry developed a twopronged plan to restore its image: export plastic waste for "recycling" overseas and add small amounts of corn starch to plastic products and claim they are now "biodegradable." It did not take long, however, for the public to figure out that although corn starch biodegrades, pieces of plastic do not. So industry jumped aboard the recycling bandwagon. Instead of "biodegradable," nearly every plastic package on the supermarket shelf now is stamped "recyclable." The plastic wasn't changed, only its label was.
Marty Forman from the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries urged fellow plastics promoters to "get our act together and show the world just how recyclable these valuable polymers are." Unfortunately, the plastics industry's recycling claims are badly misleading. Recycling plastic cannot remove most of the toxic chemicals which are passed on to the new products and those who handle them.
In addition, while paper, glass and metal waste can really be recycled that is, turned back into essentially the same product this is not the case with plastics. Each time plastic is heated its chemical composition changes and its quality decreases so that it can usually not be reused more than once. Recycling used plastic, therefore, does not make a dent in the amount of plastic needed to make the original products. And ultimately, all this plastic still ends up being landfilled or burned.
As Joann Gutin wrote in Mother Jones (March/April 1992), "Plastics recycling bears as much resemblance to traditional recycling as RV camping bears to backpacking. It might be a good idea if there was some sort of linguistic flag for the difference, the way 'Kampground' has come to mean RV site. 'RecyKling' maybe."
So what is the recycling-conscious American public to do? A number of environmental and community groups contend that ultimately the bogus recycling of plastics, both at home and overseas, can only be stopped if people refuse to use plastics. The California Resource Recovery Association, for instance, is running a "Take the Wrap" campaign to get the public to mail plastic packages with recycling labels back to the Society of Plastics Industry.
Overseas, as well, communities are beginning to organize against plastic waste imports. Environmental and development organizations in the Philippines are working with groups in the United States to stop illegal waste imports. Rene Salazar, director of the Southeast Asia Regional Institute for Community Education (SEARICE), a Philippine development organization, says, "Mafialike export companies are enticing Third World countries with potential profits to be made from trade in toxins. We have a complete list of all the imports of waste into the Philippines in 1991. We challenge the Philippine government to tell us where it went."
Using data from the U.S. Department of Customs, a new coalition has begun tracking ships known to have carried waste from the U.S. In April, activists from the U.S. and the Philippines, dressed in "Hazardous Exports Prevention Patrol" uniforms, boarded two Asiabound waste trade ships in New York Harbor, talked with the captains and hung a protest banner. Philippine members of the Coalition Against Toxic Waste vowed to meet the ships when they arrived in Asia. According to Nicanor Perlas, their purpose is to prevent waste traders from conducting "business as usual."
There are efforts, as well, to get Congress to ban overseas recycling of plastics and other international waste products. Congress is currently overhauling the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the nation's major waste law and a number of amendments have been introduced to the section dealing with international waste trade. The amendments range from one introduced by Representative Ed Towns (DNY) which would completely ban international waste trade to another which would permit a virtual free trade in waste. So far plastic industry lobbyists have succeeded in obtaining a total exemption for plastic waste exports in every proposed piece of legislation, except that of Towns.
Two Months' Plastic Garbage Exports
Plastic Scrap Exports to Asia
February 1 March 31, 1992
Country Number of Shipments Total (pounds)
China (directly) 6 210,894
Hong Kong 586 37,746,957
India 11 2,198,339
Indonesia 50 4,952,518
Japan 5 112,797
Korea 6 241,866
Malaysia 7 561,530
Pakistan 1 41,533
Philippines 58 5,385,902
Singapore 5 157,350
Thailand 6 273,071
Taiwan 6 344,611
TOTAL 750 52,053,376
Greenpeace Feature Service. Written by Ann Leonard, Greenpeace Toxic Trade Project Coordinator who investigated plastic shipments to Asia. For photos of plastic recycling factories and Greenpeace waste trade protests in Seattle and New York in Asia contact Leonard at 202/319-2454. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mariam Colonel


Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 349
930 Cash Points
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mariam Colonel


Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 349
930 Cash Points
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Mariam"]Come on guys, I thought my last response would provoke some kind of an uproar!! Did you see among many countries importing trash from abroad that Tanzania and South Africa made into the list?????
the clip on that site shows more states in the US looking forward to ban plastic materials directly or indirectly, here is bottled water...and this is the paragraph I meant from above: the list of recipients of trash:-
"During 1991, U.S. recycling companies sent over 35 million pounds of plastic waste to Indonesia. The majority of this went to two cities on the island of Java Jakarta and Surabaya. The U.S. exported over 200 million pounds of plastic waste last year to countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America, according to statistics compiled by Greenpeace from the records of a private company, the Port Import/Export Research Service. The list of recipients includes Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, Dominican Republic, Ghana, Ecuador, Guatemala, Guyana, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, Jamaica, S. Korea, Malaysia, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Taiwan, Tanzania, Thailand, and Trinidad & Tobago. " |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Summary Rating For >> East African ban on plastics bags |
Average Rating: 0.00 :: Min Rating: 0 :: Max Rating: 0 :: Number of Ratings: 0
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|